June 17, 2026
12 min read
3D blog banner showing SEBI’s push for long-term derivatives in India, with longer-term F&O contracts, Nifty expiry liquidity comparison, market makers, institutional risk appetite, securities lending and borrowing, and deeper F&O market visuals.

SEBI's Push for Long-Term Derivatives: Will It Actually Deepen India's F&O Market?

Trigger: SEBI Chairman's address at ET NOW Market Summit, June 12, 2026

On June 12, 2026, SEBI Chairman Tuhin Kanta Pandey signalled a significant shift in the regulator's direction for India's derivatives market. Speaking at the ET NOW Market Summit in Mumbai, he stated that "development of longer-term futures and options contracts in the equity derivatives market will be an important part of deepening the capital markets." The announcement is notable for what it represents: after years of restricting short-term speculative derivatives activity, SEBI is now looking to build out the long end of the F&O curve.

But long-term derivatives in India are not a new concept. They already exist. The question is why they have not taken off, and whether SEBI's intent, without addressing the structural reasons for their failure so far, will produce a different outcome this time.

Quick read

  • Long-term F&O contracts already exist on Nifty indices, but liquidity collapses beyond six months
  • On June 12, 2026, Nifty December 2026 contracts had ~90,000 combined volumes and ~3,40,000 OI. March 2027 had just 240 lots of volume and 340 lots of OI
  • The problem is not the product; it is three missing pieces: market makers, institutional sell-side risk appetite, and a robust Securities Lending and Borrowing mechanism
  • Without these foundations in place first, new long-term stock contracts will face the same thin volumes and wide spreads as existing quarterly index contracts

The Context: What SEBI Has Already Done to Fix F&O

India became the world's largest derivatives market by volume, with notional turnover of $6.4 trillion per day and annual option premiums of $2.2 trillion in 2024. But SEBI's own study found that 93% of individual F&O traders lost money. The regulator responded from November 2024 with a series of structural restrictions:

  • Weekly expiries limited to one per exchange (down from as many as 20 per month)
  • Minimum contract size raised substantially
  • Upfront collection of option premiums mandated
  • Calendar spread benefits removed on expiry day

Those measures targeted the short end of the F&O curve (weekly expiries that had become instruments of speculative retail participation). The new direction targets the opposite end: extending contracts further out in time to encourage institutional hedging, long-term position-taking, and more structured risk management. The logic is sound. The implementation challenge is significant.


The Reality Check: Long-Term Contracts Already Exist and Are Not Working

Before evaluating what SEBI is proposing, it is worth understanding the current state of long-term derivatives in India. Nifty, Bank Nifty, and Nifty Next already offer quarterly options contracts extending beyond the standard three near months. On individual stocks, the current structure offers only the near month, mid-month, and far month.

On June 12, 2026, Nifty December 2026 contracts had combined call and put volumes of approximately 90,000 contracts and open interest of approximately 3,40,000 contracts. Nifty March 2027 contracts had total volumes of just 240 lots and open interest of 340 lots. Beyond March 2027, volumes and open interest are effectively non-existent.

Nifty Contract ExpiryCombined Call + Put Volume (June 12, 2026)Total Open InterestLiquidity Assessment
December 2026~90,000 contracts~3,40,000 contractsFair: some institutional activity
March 2027~240 lots~340 lotsNegligible: functionally illiquid
Beyond March 2027Near zeroNear zeroNon-existent
Source: NSE market data, June 12, 2026. Figures are indicative and represent a single trading day's activity.

The volume cliff between December 2026 and March 2027 is stark. This is not a function of investors being unaware of longer-dated contracts. It is a function of the structural problems that make these contracts unattractive to both buyers and sellers.


The Two Problems That Kill Long-Term F&O Liquidity


Problem 1: Bid-ask spreads become prohibitively wide

The spread problem compounds with time

Even in the relatively liquid December 2026 Nifty contracts, bid-ask spreads on in-the-money (ITM) calls and puts are materially higher than near-month equivalents. By the time you move to March 2027 contracts, bid-ask spreads on most strikes become so wide as to make the contracts uneconomic for most use cases. A wide bid-ask spread is effectively a transaction tax on every entry and exit: the longer the contract, the more uncertainty in pricing, and the wider the spread. Without market makers obligated to post tight two-sided quotes, this problem does not self-correct.


Problem 2: MTM margin risk has no circuit filter

Option sellers face unlimited daily MTM exposure

For option buyers, the risk is capped at the premium paid. But for option sellers, who are essential to any functioning long-dated derivatives market, the daily mark-to-market margin requirement can be severe. Unlike futures, option premiums have no circuit filter limiting how much they can move in a single day. A seller of a long-dated put option on a volatile index can face sudden large margin calls if market conditions shift. This is a meaningful deterrent for the institutional sell-side, which is exactly the counterparty that needs to exist in volume for LEAPS to function.


The Three Missing Links

For long-dated derivatives (known in mature markets like the US as LEAPS, or Long-term Equity AnticiPation Securities) to function in India, three structural elements must be in place before the product can be expected to attract meaningful participation.

Missing LinkWhy It MattersCurrent State in India
Market Makers with Tight Spreads Without market makers obligated to post continuous two-sided quotes at narrow spreads, long-dated contracts remain illiquid. Wide spreads make entries and exits expensive, deterring both hedgers and speculators. Market making is the first condition, not an afterthought. Market making exists in India but is not mandatory for long-dated contracts. No exchange currently has a market maker programme specifically for LEAPS-style contracts.
Institutional Sell-Side Participation Long-dated options are bought primarily by large institutions using them to hedge multi-year equity portfolios. For every buyer there must be a seller willing to absorb open-ended risk for months or years. In the US, large banks, insurance companies, and hedge funds play this role. In India, this counterparty base is thin. India's institutional sell-side in derivatives is dominated by proprietary desks and FPIs. Domestic insurance and pension fund participation in the derivatives sell-side is negligible. Regulatory restrictions limit the universe of eligible sellers.
Robust Securities Lending and Borrowing (SLB) An institution that sells a long-dated call option on a stock needs to be able to borrow that stock and deliver it if the option is exercised. Without SLB, writing covered calls or running stock-replacement strategies is impossible. SLB is the backbone of any healthy long-dated single-stock derivatives market. India's SLB market is nascent. Volumes are thin, tenures are short, and the universe of lendable securities is narrow. Without reform here, long-term single-stock derivatives (which SEBI explicitly intends to expand) cannot function effectively.
Source: Publicly available market structure analysis; SEBI consultation papers and circulars.

What Will Work vs What Needs to Be Built First

The infrastructure gap

What SEBI already has

  • Long-dated index contracts (quarterly series on Nifty, Bank Nifty, Nifty Next) are already live: the product framework exists
  • Strong exchange technology infrastructure at NSE and BSE capable of handling additional contract maturities
  • Institutional appetite from FPIs who use long-dated contracts for hedging; FPI participation in December 2026 contracts is the primary source of existing liquidity
  • A regulatory willingness to differentiate between speculative short-term trading (to be restricted) and structural long-term hedging (to be encouraged)

What needs to be built first

  • A mandatory market making programme for long-dated contracts: specific spread obligations, minimum quote sizes, and margining exemptions for designated market makers
  • Reform of daily MTM margin rules for option sellers in long-dated contracts, including a circuit filter or margin cap mechanism to reduce overnight gap risk
  • Substantive SLB reform: longer tenures, wider security eligibility, incentives for institutional lenders, and integration with the F&O settlement framework
  • A pathway for domestic insurance and pension funds to participate on the sell-side, where they are currently largely excluded by regulation from writing options

The Global Parallel: How LEAPS Work in the US

In the United States, LEAPS (Long-term Equity AnticiPation Securities) are exchange-listed options with expiration dates more than one year away. They were introduced on the CBOE in 1990 and have become a standard institutional tool for multi-year hedging, stock-replacement strategies, and leveraged long-term positions.

The US LEAPS market works because all three structural conditions are present. Market makers are obligated to maintain continuous two-sided quotes. The institutional sell-side (banks, insurance companies, hedge funds) actively writes LEAPS as part of structured product creation and portfolio management. And the US stock lending market is deep and liquid, making stock-covered LEAPS strategies viable at scale.

India is not starting from zero. It has the exchange infrastructure, the legal framework, and a growing institutional investor base. But the cart is not yet in front of the horse; it is simply not there yet. SEBI's intent on June 12 is a necessary first step. The structural work that must precede the product launch is the more important second step.


Conclusion

SEBI's direction on longer-term F&O contracts is the right policy move for a market that has over-indexed on short-dated speculation. Long-dated derivatives can serve genuine economic functions: corporate hedging of equity compensation plans, institutional portfolio protection, and multi-year structured product creation. But the data from existing long-dated Nifty contracts, where March 2027 liquidity is functionally zero, tells a clear story. The problem is not that investors do not want the product. It is that the market structure does not yet support it. Mandatory market making, SLB reform, and expanded institutional sell-side participation are not nice-to-haves that can follow the product launch. They are preconditions. If SEBI launches long-term stock derivatives without building these foundations first, the contracts will sit on the exchange with thin volumes and wide spreads, exactly as the longer Nifty quarterly contracts do today. Intent is the starting line. Infrastructure is the finish line.


FAQs

1. What are long-term derivatives and why is SEBI interested in them?

Long-term derivatives are futures and options contracts with expiry dates significantly further out than the standard one to three month contracts. In mature markets, these are known as LEAPS (Long-term Equity AnticiPation Securities). SEBI Chairman Tuhin Kanta Pandey signalled on June 12, 2026 that expanding these contracts is a priority for deepening India's equity derivatives market, with a focus on supporting institutional hedging rather than short-term speculation.


2. Do long-term F&O contracts already exist in India?

Yes. Quarterly option series extending beyond three months already exist on Nifty, Bank Nifty, and Nifty Next indices. However, liquidity falls off sharply beyond the six-month horizon. On June 12, 2026, Nifty March 2027 contracts had total volumes of just 240 lots and open interest of 340 lots, versus approximately 90,000 combined volumes for December 2026 contracts. On individual stocks, F&O is currently available only for the near month, mid-month, and far month.


3. What is a market maker and why does it matter for long-dated F&O?

A market maker is an entity obligated to continuously post both buy and sell quotes for a contract at specified maximum spreads. Without market makers, long-dated contracts suffer from wide bid-ask spreads that make them uneconomic for most users. Market makers are essential infrastructure; without them, the product exists on paper but not in practice. Any LEAPS development plan must address market maker obligations as a first step, not an afterthought.


4. What is Securities Lending and Borrowing and why is it critical for stock LEAPS?

Securities Lending and Borrowing (SLB) allows investors to temporarily borrow shares they do not own to fulfil delivery obligations, for example, when an institution has sold a call option and needs to deliver shares if it is exercised. Without a deep SLB market, institutions cannot safely write long-dated single-stock options. India's SLB market is currently thin in volume and narrow in security eligibility. Reform of SLB is a precondition for any viable long-term single-stock derivatives market.


5. Why do 93% of F&O traders in India lose money?

SEBI's own study found that 93% of individual F&O traders lost money, while proprietary trading desks and foreign institutions consistently profited. The mismatch reflects a structural information and risk management advantage held by sophisticated participants. Short-dated weekly options with tight expiries amplified this dynamic by encouraging high-frequency retail speculation. SEBI's recent restrictions on weekly expiries and higher contract sizes were designed to reduce retail participation in this losing trade. Long-dated contracts, by design, attract different participants with longer time horizons and more structured hedging objectives.


How do derivatives and market volatility affect your investment portfolio?

F&O market structure changes affect equity market volatility, institutional behaviour, and ultimately the returns on long-term equity portfolios. The FinnFit Financial Fitness Test takes 3 minutes and shows you whether your portfolio is structured to withstand market volatility and aligned to your long-term goals.

Take the FinnFit Test

Disclaimer: This article is for general information and educational purposes only. It does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any securities or financial instruments. References to SEBI's announced intent are based on publicly reported statements at the ET NOW Market Summit on June 12, 2026 and do not represent a formal regulatory circular or rule. Derivatives trading involves substantial risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. F&O volume and open interest data cited are from a single trading day and are indicative only. Please consult a SEBI-registered investment adviser before making any investment decision involving derivatives.

Published At: Jun 17, 2026 06:20 am
15